Skip to main content

Coexistence of paternally-inherited ABCC8 mutation and mosaic paternal uniparental disomy 11p hyperinsulinism



Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is an overgrowth syndrome with variable clinical phenotype and complex molecular aetiology. It is mainly caused by dysregulation of the chromosome 11p15 imprinted region, which results in overgrowth in multiple tissues, often in a mosaic manner.

Case presentation

A large-for-gestational-age infant without any other somatic features of BWS presented with medically refractory hyperinsulinism (HI) requiring 80% pancreatectomy. Next generation sequencing with congenital HI sequencing panel identified a pathogenic ABCC8:c.1792C > T (p.Arg598Ter) variant of paternal origin, suggestive of focal HI. However, pancreatic histology revealed atypical findings of coalescing nests and trabeculae of adenomatosis scattered with islets with isolated enlarged, hyperchromatic nuclei scattered throughout the pancreas. Methylation analysis, SNP-based chromosomal microarray and short tandem repeat markers analysis revealed mosaic segmental paternal uniparental disomy (UPD) 11p15.5-p15.1 in the pancreatic tissue, but not the peripheral blood, suggestive of BWS/BW-spectrum HI.


This case highlights the importance of integrating the clinical presentation and subsequent clinical course, together with radiological, genetic and histological findings in the definitive diagnosis of this rare yet clinically important entity. In addition, this is the first report that demonstrated the level of paternal inherited c.1792 T pathogenic variant in the pancreatic tissue being directly correlated to the mosaic level of pUPD.


Congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) is the most common cause of persistent hypoglycaemia in infants. It is characterized by dysregulated insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells and is a group of heterogeneous conditions that vary in terms of clinical severity, histopathology and molecular aetiology. Inactivating mutations of the ABCC8 and KCNJ11 genes, which are located on 11p15.1 and encode the SUR1 and Kir6.2 subunits of the pancreatic β-cell ATP-sensitive potassium channel (KATP channel) respectively, are the most common genetic aetiology of HI [1].

There are two major histological subtypes — diffuse and focal HI. The two have distinct molecular aetiology and response to medical treatment. Rarely, some patients have atypical histology that could not be easily classified into either focal or diffuse forms [2]. They have enlargement of β-cell nuclei that is distinct from diffuse HI in several discrete regions of the pancreas, which suggests the possibility of mosaicism [3].

Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is an overgrowth syndrome with variable clinical phenotype and complex molecular aetiology. It is mainly caused by the dysregulation of the chromosome 11p15 imprinted region, which results in overgrowth in multiple tissues, often in a mosaic manner [4]. While only a small proportion of HI are associated with BWS, transient HI occurs in up to 50% of BWS neonates, and 5% have persistent HI requiring medical and/or surgical management [5, 6]. The exact mechanism of HI in patients with BWS has remained unclear. In a cohort of children with HI and BWS, it was demonstrated that most did not have a concomitant KATP defect, however they did have pancreatic lesions significantly larger than those seen in cases of focal HI [5]. For the small proportion of BWS with a concomitant paternally transmitted KATP mutation, their HI were remarkedly severe and prolonged [5]. Somatic features of BWS may not be readily apparent in these patients compared to classical BWS [5].

Herein, we report a case of a large-for-gestational-age infant with medically refractory HI due to a paternally transmitted KATP mutation, who was subsequently diagnosed with mosaic BWS related to mosaic segmental pUPD (paternal uniparental disomy) 11 based on molecular testing of the pancreatic lesion.

Case presentation

A female infant was born at 37 weeks of gestation to a non-consanguineous Chinese couple, with a birth weight of 4.3 kg (>2SD). Antenatal history was unremarkable with no gestational diabetes, polyhydramnios nor placentomegaly. She presented with a hypoglycaemic seizure in the first hour of life and required a high glucose infusion rate (GIR) of 20 mg/kg/min to maintain normoglycaemia. Physical examination showed macrosomia but no other dysmorphic features (Fig. 1a). Critical samples taken when blood glucose was 2.8 mmol/L on day 2 of life were compatible with hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia (insulin = 33.9mIU/L, blood beta-hydroxybutyrate < 0.5 mmol/L). She was started on the highest dose of diazoxide (15 mg/kg/day) with hydrochlorothiazide with no response. Octreotide (15mcg/kg/day) was therefore added on with partial response, and she still required a GIR of 11 mg/kg/min.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a. Picture of the proband with no somatic features suggestive of BWS. 1b. 18F-Dopa PET scan showed accentuated 18F-dopa uptake in the pancreatic body, with a lesser degree of diffused activity in pancreatic head and tail, suggestive of a focal lesion. 1c-e. Histology of resected pancreatic tissue. c. The pancreas shows preserved acinar architecture with prominent islets of Langerhans (arrowhead), consist of coalescing nests and trabeculae of endocrine cells. d. High power field showing some islets containing isolated, enlarged, hyperchromatic nuclei, which is over 2 times the size of the nuclei in the adjacent islet cells. e. Immunohistochemical stains confirmed the nests and trabeculae of endocrine cells are positive for neuroendocrine marker chromogranin and many of them express insulin by immunohistochemistry

18F-Dopa PET scan at 3 months of age showed accentuated 18F-dopa uptake in the pancreatic body compared with a lesser degree of diffuse activity in pancreatic head and tail, suggestive of a focal lesion (Fig. 1b). There was no organomegaly or asymmetric kidneys. The first partial pancreatectomy was performed at 5 months of age. A distal lesion was identified by gross inspection intraoperatively, and a distal resection (~ 5% pancreatectomy) was performed. Post-operatively, a high GIR requirement at 11 mg/kg/min was still required. Histology from resected tissue revealed no evidence of pancreatic adenomatosis. Therefore, a second operation was carried out with real-time frozen section evaluation, resulting in an 80% pancreatectomy. Resected pancreatic tissue revealed multiple discrete areas of adenomatosis interspersed between areas of normal exocrine acini. There were areas of coalescing nests and trabeculae (Fig. 1c) that were negative for p57 staining, suggestive of adenomatous hyperplasia; whilst some areas contained islets with isolated enlarged, hyperchromatic nuclei and exocrine acini at the periphery (Fig. 1d). These enlarged nuclei were positive for p57 staining. Post-operatively, the GIR could be further lowered to 3 mg/kg/min but she was unable to be completely weaned off her dextrose infusion. She was subsequently restarted on diazoxide with no response, and hence changed to octreotide. She finally managed to be weaned off from intravenous dextrose with reasonable fasting tolerance of 9 h at the age of 7 months.

Molecular analysis

Peripheral blood of proband and both parents, and the resected pancreatic tissue (at two different areas: Pancreas 1A and Pancreas 2A) from the proband were collected for genomic DNA extraction and further molecular genetic analysis.

A heterozygous pathogenic ABCC8 NM_000352.4:c.1792C > T p.(Arg598Ter) was found in the DNA extracted from peripheral blood of proband through NGS gene panel analysis. This nonsense loss-of-function c.1792 T variant was previously reported [7]. Sanger DNA sequencing confirmed the NGS finding and confirmed the variant was inherited from the father. The proportion of the c.1792C and c.1792 T variant present in Pancreas 1A and 2A were of approximately 10%:90 and 30%:70%, respectively, estimated by peak height for the c.1792C and c.1792 T in the sequence chromatogram (Fig. 2a). Absolute quantitation by digital PCR analysis showed that the proportion of c.1792 T was approximately 88.9 and 70.6% in Pancreas 1A and 2A, respectively (Fig. 2b), which was concomitant to the level of mosaicism of pUPD11p region carrying the c.1792 T variant inherited from the father.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Sanger DNA sequencing and absolute quantitation by digital PCR analyses of ABCC8:c.1792C > T and allele difference plots of chromosome 11. a Sanger DNA sequencing results showed C:T allelic ratio in DNA extracted from peripheral blood and Pancreas 1A and 2A tissues of the proband. b The proportion of c.1792 T variant in mother, father and proband. The c.1792 T was absent in the mother and presence at 50% in father and proband blood DNA. Pancreas 1A and 2A DNA showed to have 88.8 and 70.6%. of c.1792 T. The proportion of c.1792 T in each DNA sample was averaged of 3 independent assays. Error bars: standard error mean. c Allele difference plots of chromosome 11 on DNA extracted from Pancreas 1A and 2A and from peripheral blood of proband and proband’s parents. Red horizontal curly bracket and red vertical rectangle indicate the 17.44 Mb of AOH region in 11p15.5p15.1, arr [GRCh37] 11p15.5p15.1(230750_17671331)× 2 hmz, in Pancreas 1A and 2A. The affected SNPs in Pancreas 1A and 2A are shown in dark grey dots. High level of mosaicism is observed in Pancreas 2A. Vertical dotted line and arrow indicates the location of ABCC8 gene (chr11:17414431–17,498,392, human genome assembly: GRCh37) which is situated with in the AOH region (within red vertical rectangle). Inset (lower right) illustrates the segmental paternal UPD 11p and the location of c.1792C > T in the pancreas DNA, where the beige and white color shaded regions represents maternal and paternal inherited chromosome respectively

DNA methylation analysis for chromosome 11p15 showed normal methylation pattern at both IC1 (H19-IGF2 imprinting centre) and ICR2 (KCNQ1OT1/KCNQ1 imprinting centre) in the peripheral blood leucocytes of the proband. However, gain of methylation at IC1 and loss of methylation at IC2 were detected in the DNA extracted from resected pancreas, consistent with a diagnosis of Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome due to pUPD.

SNP-based chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis showed copy number neutrality in DNA extracted from the peripheral blood of proband and parents. However, the pancreatic tissue showed a 17.44 Mb region of copy number neutral loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in 11p15.5-p15.1, suggesting segmental UPD 11, with a higher level of mosaicism for Pancreas 1A (~ 90%) compared to Pancreas 2A (~ 70%) (Fig. 2c) for the same region. Trio genotyping analysis on Pancreas 1A and parents using UPDtool [8] based on the SNP genotype results from CytoScan 750 k SNP array further revealed that the 17.44 Mb of LOH in Pancreas 1A was paternally inherited and the rest of the chromosome 11 was biparental, confirming mosaic segmental pUPD 11p15.5-p15.1. CMA was suggested to be a sensitive tool to investigate low level of mosaic segmental UPD [4], however that sensitivity varies between array types in the case of the Affymatrix CytoScan 750 k SNP array, mosaicism above 20% can be detected. Therefore, short tandem repeat (STR) markers analysis as a different molecular approach was performed to verify the level of mosaicism. Based on the peak height ratios of the maternal and paternal alleles detected in the in DNA extracted from Pancreas 1A and 2A (Table 1), paternal allele from D11S1363 to D11S1923 in the 11p15.5-p15.4 region accounted for 83–90% and 68–76% respectively. The results were consistent with the mosaic level of pUPD in 11p15.5-q15.4 shown in CMA. The rest of the chromosome 11 was biparental in both pancreatic sites.

Table 1 Analysis of short tandem repeat (STR) marker inheritance and their allelic ratio in pancreas DNA from two different loci (Pancreas 1A and 2A) from the proband


We described an infant with severe HI resulting from a paternally-inherited ABCC8 mutation in conjunction with mosaic segmental pUPD11p15 demonstrated in the pancreatic tissue from the second resection but not in peripheral blood leucocytes, suggestive of BWS/BW-spectrum HI. With pUPD11p15, the loss of maternal allele resulted in a loss of H19 and CDKN1C expression, which usually negatively regulates cell proliferation; whereas the biallelic IGF-II expression promotes cell growth [9]. Therefore, pancreatic adenomatous hyperplasia and hyperinsulinism were attributed to the combination of the KATP defect along with the pUPD11 and the imbalance of imprinted genes at 11p15 region. In contrast to the classical histological findings in focal HI related to a paternally-inherited ABCC8 mutation with lesion confines to a small localized area, our patient had multiple foci of adenomatous hyperplasia throughout the pancreas. Furthermore, the level of mosaicism of UPD cells in the pancreas correlated with the shifted allele frequency of the ABCC8 mutation. To our understanding, this is the first report using the accurate and sensitive assays to demonstrate the direct correlation of the paternally inherited ABCC8 c.1792 T level with mosaic level of pUPD.

Other than being macrosomic, our patient had no other somatic features of BWS. The consideration of testing for BWS was triggered by the atypical histological findings. This distinct pancreatic histology had been described in children with Beckwith-Wiedemann Spectrum [5, 10, 11]. In a large series of 28 patients with BWS and persistent HI, their phenotypes were reported to range from isolated, subtle hemihypertrophy or umbilical hernia to frank BWS phenotype with multiple somatic features [6]. Only four of them had concomitant KATP mutations. Therefore, It was suggested that, even in the absence of somatic features of BWS, testing should be considered in HI cases with large ‘focal’ pancreatic lesions with or without a KATP mutation [5]. The diagnosis of BWS is important due to their inherent vulnerability to embryonal tumours, affecting up to 8% of BWS patients [4, 12]. Calton et al. reported a similar case of large/multifocal focal HI resulting from a paternally inherited recessive ABCC8 mutation [11]. That patient, like our patient, had no clinical features of BWS. BWS testing was only performed at the age of 20 months when he developed hepatoblastoma. Again, similar to our patient, pUPD11p was identified in the affected tissue (hepatoblastoma tissue and the stored pancreatic tissue), but not in peripheral blood or buccal DNA [11]. This highlights that infants with HI related to mosaic BWS could also develop BWS-associated tumours due to mosaic UPD, and that tumour surveillance is indicated. It has been suggested that the tumour risk could be associated with the level of mosaicism for UPD within specific organs [13]. Since tissues from other organs were not available for testing in our patient, it is unclear whether other organs are affected by pUPD11p. Therefore, tumour surveillance during early childhood is warranted.

With the variability of mosaicism between tissues in patients with BWS, the source of DNA for molecular analysis is extremely important. In our patient, absence of mosaicism in the peripheral blood leukocytes would have wrongly concluded as ‘normal study’ if the pancreatic tissues were not sent for further analysis. Therefore, similar to other mosaic conditions, affected tissue should always be sent for further molecular analysis if possible [4].


This case highlights the importance of integrating the clinical presentation and subsequent clinical course, together with radiological, genetic and histological findings in the definitive diagnosis of this rare yet clinically important entity. In managing HI caused by both pUPD11p and KATP mutation, the HI course could be severe, and hypoglycaemia might persist despite extensive pancreatectomy, trial of resuming medical treatment should be considered, allowing better glycaemic control.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.



Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome


Chromosomal microarray


Glucose infusion rate




Loss of heterozygosity


Uniparental disomy


  1. Vajravelu ME, De León DD. Genetic characteristics of patients with congenital hyperinsulinism. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2018;30(4):568–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Adzick NS, De Leon DD, States LJ, Lord K, Bhatti TR, Becker SA, et al. Surgical treatment of congenital hyperinsulinism: results from 500 pancreatectomies in neonates and children. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(1):27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hussain K, Flanagan SE, Smith VV, Ashworth M, Day M, Pierro A, et al. An ABCC8 gene mutation and mosaic uniparental isodisomy resulting in atypical diffuse congenital hyperinsulinism. Diabetes. 2008;57(1):259–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brioude F, Kalish JM, Mussa A, Foster AC, Bliek J, Ferrero GB, et al. Expert consensus document: clinical and molecular diagnosis, screening and management of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: an international consensus statement. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(4):229–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalish JM, Boodhansingh KE, Bhatti TR, Ganguly A, Conlin LK, Becker SA, et al. Congenital hyperinsulinism in children with paternal 11p uniparental isodisomy and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. J Med Genet. 2016;53(1):53–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Senniappan S, Ismail D, Shipster C, Beesley C, Hussain K. The heterogeneity of hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia in 19 patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome due to KvDMR1 hypomethylation. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2015;28(1–2):83–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sang Y, Xu Z, Liu M, Yan J, Wu Y, Zhu C, et al. Mutational analysis of ABCC8, KCNJ11, GLUD1, HNF4A and GCK genes in 30 Chinese patients with congenital hyperinsulinism. Endocr J. 2014;61(9):901–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schroeder C, Sturm M, Dufke A, Mau-Holzmann U, Eggermann T, Poths S, et al. UPDtool: a tool for detection of iso- and heterodisomy in parent-child trios using SNP microarrays. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(12):1562–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Damaj L, le Lorch M, Verkarre V, Werl C, Hubert L, Nihoul-Fékété C, et al. Chromosome 11p15 paternal isodisomy in focal forms of neonatal hyperinsulinism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(12):4941–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Laje P, Palladino AA, Bhatti TR, States LJ, Stanley CA, Adzick NS. Pancreatic surgery in infants with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and hyperinsulinism. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(12):2511–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Calton EA, Temple IK, Mackay DJG, Lever M, Ellard S, Flanagan SE, et al. Hepatoblastoma in a child with a paternally-inherited ABCC8 mutation and mosaic paternal uniparental disomy 11p causing focal congenital hyperinsulinism. Eur J Med Genet. 2013;56(2):114–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maas SM, Vansenne F, Kadouch DJM, Ibrahim A, Bliek J, Hopman S, et al. Phenotype, cancer risk, and surveillance in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome depending on molecular genetic subgroups. Am J Med Genet A. 2016;170(9):2248–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shuman C, Beckwith JB, Weksberg R. Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJ, Stephens K, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993. Available from: [cited 2019 Sep 15].

Download references


We thank the family for their permission to publish this case report. JMK acknowledges support from Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood Cancer.


National Cancer Institute, Grant/Award Number: K08 CA193915.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



JYL was the major writer of this manuscript and is the paediatric endocrinologist taking care of the case. KYC was a major contributor in writing the molecular findings of this case report. DDD, JMK and BHC had been involved in revising this case report critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. KYC, KSY and AG analysed and interpreted the molecular analysis. FL performed the histological examination of the pancreas. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Brian Hon Yin Chung or Kelvin Yuen Kwong Chan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent to write and publish this case report was obtained from the family.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of this case report.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tung, J.Yl., Lai, S.H.Y., Au, S.L.K. et al. Coexistence of paternally-inherited ABCC8 mutation and mosaic paternal uniparental disomy 11p hyperinsulinism. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol 2020, 13 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: