Genetic diagnosis of Beckwith Wiedemann syndrome and Silver-Russell syndrome
© Kim et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Published: 3 October 2013
Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is fetal overgrowth syndrome, whereas Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS) is characterized by pre- or postnatal growth retardation. BWS and SRS share molecular epigenetic defects in chromosome 11p15, where two imprinting centers, LIT1-differentially methylated region (MDR) and H19-DMR, exist. A small number of patients with SRS harbor maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7q as well. Extensive genetic analyses including methylation specific (MS) PCR-RFLP, MS-MLPA, microsatellite markers or MS-pyrosequencing analysis were performed using genomic DNA obtained from peripheral leukocytes to identify the epigenetic detects in patients with BWS and SRS. Ten out of 14 BWS patients (71.4%) showed hypomethylation in LIT1-DMR. One BWS patient harbored hypermethylation in H19-DMR (7.1%). Two BWS patients had both H19-DMR and LIT1-DMR defects, one of whom has paternal UPD at chr. 11 (14.3%). Eleven out of 13 SRS patients (78.6 %) showed hypomethylation in H19-DMR. One SRS patient (6.7%) had UPD at 7q. With MS-pyrosequencing analysis, epigenetic defects were identified in 93.1% of BWS patients and 85.7% of SRS patients. These positive rates are higher than previously reported positive rates, 80% in BWS and 50% in SRS. In addition, with MS-pyrosequencing analyses, quantification of methylation defects was available, which could identify partial methylation defects that were not revealed by MS-PCR-RFLP or MS-MLPA. The validity of MS-pyrosequencing method for the genetic diagnosis of BWS or SRS is needed to be investigated in a large patient cohort.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.