Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of Testicular Volumes Obtained by Ultrasound (US) in our Hospital with those obtained by Formulas (means ± SD) All using the US Width

From: Testicular volumes revisited: A proposal for a simple clinical method that can closely match the volumes obtained by ultrasound and its clinical application

Age range

years

Number

US (ml) equation

W2 x L x 0.52

Formula (ml)

W3 X 0.8

p value

1 to 2

19

0.64 ± 0.25

0.64 ± 0.24

>0.5

3 to 6

26

1.05 ± 0.44

1.08 ± 0.50

>0.5

7 to 9

15

1.37 ± 0.56

1.46 ± 0.63

>0.5

10 to 11

9

1.40 ± 0.60

1.57 ± 0.77

>0.5

12 to 13

18

7.79 ± 4.40

7.83 ± 4.81

>0.5

14 to 15

10

12.87 ± 7.12

12.50 ± 7.43

>0.5

16 to 17

13

18.31 ± 4.63

18.02 ± 5.54

>0.5

Age range

years

Number

US (ml) equation

W x H x L x 0.52

Formula (ml)

W 3 x 0.64

p value

1 to 2

19

0.48 ± 0.17

0.51 ± 0.20

>0.5

3 to 6

26

0.78 ± 0.34

0.87 ± 0.40

>0.1

7 to 9

15

0.95 ± 0.42

1.17 ± 0.51

>0.1

10 to 11

9

1.06 ± 0.35

1.26 ± 0.61

>0.1

12 to 13

18

5.94 ± 3.31

6.26 ± 3.85

>0.5

14 to 15

10

10.02 ± 4.76

9.99 ± 5.95

>0.5

16 to 17

13

15.49 ± 4.06

14.42 ± 4.44

>0.5

Age range

years

Number

US (ml) equation

W x H x L x 0.71

Formula (ml)

W 3 x 0.88

p value

1 to 2

19

0.65 ± 0.24

0.70 ± 0.27

>0.5

3 to 6

26

1.06 ± 0.46

1.19 ± 0.55

>0.1

7 to 9

15

1.30 ± 0.58

1.61 ± 0.70

>0.1

10 to 11

9

1.45 ± 0.48

1.73 ± 0.84

>0.1

12 to 13

18

8.10 ± 4.52

8.61 ± 5.21

>0.5

14 to 15

10

13.68 ± 6.50

13.75 ± 8.18

>0.5

16 to 17

13

21.15 ± 5.54

19.83 ± 6.10

>0.5