From: Disorders of sex development (DSD) web-based information: quality survey of DSD team websites
Tool | Validated | A measure of | Coding plan | Scoring |
---|---|---|---|---|
Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) | Yes | Reading level (grade) of written material | All DSD Team Pages reviewed as one document, resulting in a single score DSD Team Links and Other Webpages scored individually | Count multisyllabic words across 30 sentences; sentences taken from beginning, middle and end of document Total sum converted into grade level |
Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) | Yes | Understandibility and actionability of information | All webpages (DSD Team Pages, DSD Team Links and Other Pages) scored individually Each webpage received both understandability and actionability score | 2 scales: “understandability” (17 items), “actionability” (7 items) Rating: 0 (Disagree) or 1 (Agree) that information presented on a page met item criteria 70% items meeting criteria considered to be acceptable for each scale |
DISCERN | Yes | Quality of online health information regarding specific treatment choices | Any webpages with information related to hormone replacement or surgery scored individually Each treatment received own DISCERN score | 15 specific items + 1 “global” item Rating: 1 (criterion not met at all) to 5 (criterion completely met) Score (sum of 15 items)a • < 38 = Poor • 39–50 = Fair • 51–62 = Good • 63–75 = Excellent |
Completeness Rating | No | Overall completeness of information provided across a range of DSD topics | All DSD Team Pages and DSD Team Links reviewed individually Overall completeness score for site generated across webpages | 25 items Rating: 0 (information not provided about item) or 1 (information provided about item) “Percentage complete” score for each site |