Study | N | Design/Duration | Agea/Model | Outcome (∆HSDS or statistical model) | P Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dahlgren 2005 [36] | 77 | Ob/prepubertal to FH | Prepubertal during >2 years GH therapy vs prepubertal during <2 years GH therapy | Mean gain FH SDS prepubertal for >2 years GH therapy = 1.7; prepubertal for <2 years = 0.9 | <0.001 |
de Ridder 2008 [47] | 150 | Data from 2 previous GH trials; R, DB/5 years[38]; R, C/3 years[48] | Median age 7.5/Statistical model predicting HSDS at puberty | Age at start (−0.27 estimated coefficient)Other significant predictors: HSDS at start (0.71 estimated coefficient), target height SDS (0.13 estimated coefficient), GH dose X IGF-I SDS at start (−0.29 estimated coefficient), gender (−0.34 estimated coefficient) | <0.0001 = 0.009 to <0.0001 |
Ranke 2010 [45] | 161 | KIGS, clinical trials/7.7 years | Median age 7.8 years/Statistical models predicting AH SDS and ∆HSDS | 70% of variability in adult height SDS: HSDS at GH start, ∆HSDS 1st year on GH, years on treatment [younger start, longer phase], maternal HSDS, length SDS at birth, SRS diagnosis | NR |
 |  |  |  | 60% of variability in ∆HSDS: ∆HSDS 1st year GH, H-MPH SDS at GH start, years of GH treatment [younger start, longer phase] |  |
van Pareren 2003 [37] | 54 | MC, R, DB/mean 7.8 years | Mean age 8.1/∆HSDS correlations | ∆HSDS from start of GH treatment to AH negatively correlated with age at treatment start: r = −0.36 | <0.01 |